‘Flat-rate’ COLA cuts Social Security for most Americans, critics say

An old idea to increase all Social Security recipients' benefits by the same dollar amount each year is gaining traction, but some say this would be a disaster for middle-income Americans.

In 1987, former Democratic Rep. Tim Penny from Minnesota's 1st Congressional District proposed a "Flat-Rate COLA" that would pay all beneficiaries the same cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA. The COLA dollar amount would be set at the COLA received by a beneficiary at the 20th percentile. By doing this, lowest-income beneficiaries would receive larger benefits, poverty would be reduced, and Social Security's insolvency would be delayed, advocates said.

The trust fund that supplements incoming payroll taxes to pay monthly Social Security benefits is expected to run dry by the end of 2032, according to the program's trustees. When that happens, law requires benefits to be reduced by an estimated 22% to ensure the program’s costs do not exceed its revenues.

But critics of the flat-rate COLA, like the nonprofit and nonpartisan AARP, calculate that 80% of beneficiaries would see the purchasing power of their benefits erode year after year, leaving many in or near poverty.

"For 80% of beneficiaries, the flat-rate COLA would erode the inflation protection that Social Security…

Original source: https://www.usatoday.com/money/