- 0
- 223 words
A federal judge on Friday rejected McDonald’s request to dismiss a proposed class action accusing it of defrauding consumers about the content of its McRib sandwich.
\n\nThe plaintiffs accused McDonald’s of intentionally shaping McRib patties with ridges to resemble pork ribs and make diners believe the sandwich contains rib meat, an expensive cut known for its higher fat content and rich flavor.
\n\nConsumers said McDonald’s actual use of lower-grade pork products including shoulder, heart, tripe or stomach caused them to overpay for the McRib, one of its most expensive menu items.
\n\nWhile dismissing some claims, U.S. District Judge April Perry in McDonald’s hometown of Chicago called it premature to accept the company’s argument that no reasonable consumer could expect the McRib to contain rib meat.
\n\nShe said McDonald’s website describes the sandwich only as containing pork, and reasonable consumers need not do research before buying a $7 fast-food sandwich.
\n\nThe judge also said ads highlighting the meat’s rib-like shape could support a claim of intent to defraud, though further proof was needed.
\n\n“Plaintiffs’ proffered understanding of ‘McRib’ is not unreasonable or fanciful,” Perry wrote.
\n\nMcDonald’s has sold the McRib periodically since 1981.
\n\nIt contended that distinctive product names do not…
Original source: https://www.nbcnews.com/business
